The ops lead at a growing snack brand was being honest about what keeps him up at night. He knows he’s probably overpaying on multiple ingredients. He knows competitive bids would give him leverage. He just can’t run them because each one is a manual slog.
The RFP paradox
Every procurement professional we talk to knows the value of competitive bidding. One company discovered they’d been paying 3x market price on a key ingredient — they just hadn’t rebid in over two years.
But running an RFP in mid-market CPG means compiling 30–50 questions per ingredient, emailing 4–6 suppliers, waiting for partial responses, extracting answers into a spreadsheet, following up for the other 40 questions, and repeating. One sourcing lead estimated she does this 30–50 times per year — at 4–6 suppliers each time. That’s 200+ supplier interactions per year, all over email.
Multiply across your full ingredient portfolio and the math breaks. So the team triages: bid the biggest-spend ingredients, accept increases on everything else.
The teams that most need competitive data are the ones least able to generate it. That’s not a people problem. It’s an infrastructure problem.
What changes the math
When supplier responses are extracted from email automatically — quotes parsed, specs normalized, missing answers flagged — the bottleneck shifts from data compilation to decision making. One customer compressed RFP cycles from three weeks to three days.
The result isn’t just savings on the bids you run. It’s savings on the bids you now can run. The coordination tax shrinks because the work that consumed 15–25 hours per week now happens in the background.
Related
Waystation compresses RFP cycles from weeks to days. No supplier behavior change required.
Book a Demo